Dunkirk (2017) 1080p YIFY Movie

Dunkirk (2017) 1080p

Allied soldiers from Belgium, the British Empire and France are surrounded by the German Army, and evacuated during a fierce battle in World War II.

IMDB: 8.3101 Likes

  • Genre: Action | Drama
  • Quality: 1080p
  • Size: 2.04G
  • Resolution: 1920x1080 / 23.976 (23976/1000) FPSfps
  • Language: English
  • Run Time: 107
  • IMDB Rating: 8.3/10 
  • MPR: Normal
  • Peers/Seeds: 23 / 314

The Synopsis for Dunkirk (2017) 1080p

Evacuation of Allied soldiers from Belgium, the British Empire, and France, who were cut off and surrounded by the German army from the beaches and harbor of Dunkirk, France, between May 26- June 04, 1940, during Battle of France in World War II.

The Director and Players for Dunkirk (2017) 1080p

[Director]Christopher Nolan
[Role:]Barry Keoghan
[Role:]Fionn Whitehead
[Role:]Mark Rylance

The Reviews for Dunkirk (2017) 1080p

A technical masterpiece that is nearly devoid of palpable emotion and compelling characters.Reviewed byCameron Clay (criticadelcinema)Vote: 7/10

Might as well get right to it, then. At the risk of sounding like a contrarian, I did not love this film. Do I love elements of this? Yes. Is this a 5-star masterpiece? Unfortunately, no.

The cinematography here at least, is masterful. Director Christopher Nolan has, without a doubt, reached the pinnacle of on-screen spectacle here. The feats of practical effects in this film are breathtaking. The casting of nearly 6,000 extras, authentic WWII vehicles, and shooting on location in Dunkirk, France contribute to a great sense of scale here. There is ongoing trend of action films in recent years of relying on CGI, and thankfully Nolan bucks that trend.

Similar to War for the Planet of the Apes, much of the film plays out without much dialogue, leaning on just the score and sound design in most scenes. It almost goes without saying that Hans Zimmer delivers with another incredible score. The sound design is also extremely well crafted, which, paired with Nolan's great work behind the camera, truly transports you to the Battle of Dunkirk. The wailing of planes passing above, the drone of gunfire, and the roar of explosions all contribute to the complete immersion into the world these characters are trapped in. This results in some of the most immersive wartime action scenes since Saving Private Ryan.

This film has and will continue to be compared to World War II classic Saving Private Ryan. Both films are beautifully filmed WWII period pieces with casts that deliver great performances. The similarities end there. Whereas Saving Private Ryan was engrossing as a narrative due to it's characters with depth and arcs, Dunkirk instead leans on it's subject matter and spectacle.

And while the subject matter of Dunkirk is fascinating, as a film it lacks emotional firepower due to the absence of a strongly written protagonist. This is strangely uncharacteristic of a director of Nolan's caliber, especially when you recall the complex character work in his most acclaimed films: The Dark Knight, Memento, and The Prestige. Instead of focusing on a single character or single group of characters, the focus is spread across three protagonists in completely different situations. Showing the Dunkirk Evacuation through the three different perspectives of those on the beach, the sea, and the air is only an interesting proposition on paper. The narrative, due to this writing choice, is spread far too thin, with few characters getting enough screen time to develop even the mildest emotional connection.

While the characters in this film aren't written to even remotely be compelling, the great work from this cast is not to be overlooked. Harry Styles, known for being a member of English boy band One Direction, is surprisingly excellent here in his acting debut. Mark Rylance, Kenneth Branagh, and Fionn Whitehead also all give standout performances despite the limited screen time they are given.

I should love this film. Historical drama? WWII setting? My favorite director Christopher Nolan? Amazing cinematography? Superb performances from an ensemble cast? All of these elements made me sure I would love this going in. But, Dunkirk's lack of emotional connection severely detracts from the awe-inspiring scope and technical prowess displayed.

If I reviewed based on visuals alone, this is a slam-dunk, walk-off home run of a 5-star film. While a focus on grandeur and situation over character depth and emotion may work for some (it obviously worked for 98% of critics on Rotten Tomatoes), it did not work for this critic.

This is without a doubt a cinematic achievement, but without an emotional core, it's impossible for this film not to feel cold and empty. Despite being a technical masterpiece, this is Christopher Nolan's most disappointing film yet.

Reviewed bysomfVote: 10/10/10

Saw an early screening tonight in Denver.

I don't know where to begin. So I will start at the weakest link. Theacting. Still great, but any passable actor could have been given anyof the major roles and done a great job. I know almost no more aboutthe battle of Dunkirk after seeing the film than I did before, and I amnot exactly a WWII historian. Truth be told, I learned all I know aboutthe battle of Dunkirk from the movie poster. Does that weaken the film?Hell no, this is a film about survival. The opening scene tells it alland sets the stage as we get our first glimpse into a young soldier'sneed to stay alive, and his creative attempts to do so. That actor mayeven be considered the main character of the film. More words have beenwritten so far in this review than he speaks. And I have no clue whothe actor in that role is. It is humorous that Tom Hardy looks likeBane through most the film in the role of a pilot wearing an oxygenmask throughout. Kenneth Branagh is the only officer with any lines inthe film, so that should give you an idea of the POV that weexperience. We are the enlisted man trying to find a way to stay alivein a chaotic and harrowing battle. Though I believe Dunkirk will winevery single technical Oscar, I would be surprised if it has any actingnominations at all.

How does Nolan elevate this above other films of a similar nature? Ithink he says it best himself, when he describes Dunkirk as a thrillermore than a war film. He pulls that off superbly.

When a ship starts to take in water as numerous bullets penetrate itshull, I wanted to jump out of my seat and cover up the holes myself.

The film has three separate stories that are titled Mole, Sea and Air.And we all know where Moles live. The way the narratives of the threestories unfold and how they are all tied together is what makes thefilm a masterpiece. Much has been said about Nolan using IMAX filmcameras and how the film is enriched by this. I don't know. I doubt Isaw actual film being projected at my screening. Every frame lookedterrific though.

So what is the most superlative aspect of the film? Gotta be thesoundtrack. Hans Zimmer will win the Oscar for this without a doubt. So, so brilliant. This is not a soundtrack that I would buy at the storeand play on my stereo. This is a soundtrack that weaves throughout thethree narratives seamlessly and creates this phenomenal sense oftension. There are times when a two or three minute tense orchestralpassage plays continuously as the story shifts from the ground to thesea then to the air and the music draws the three stories together.Zimmer's soundtrack reminds me of the way that Bernard Hermann's workwas so vitally important in building suspense in most Hitchcock films.Though that description almost sells Zimmer short. His soundtrack isthat good.

I don't think this is a film that will retain even half of its strengthin your home theater. No folks, this is a film that you cough up for anoverpriced IMAX ticket and rationalize it by knowing that experiencingDunkirk in any other fashion will just not cut it.

Reviewed byNimai KolegaVote: 10/10/10

Dunkirk is, in my opinion, yet another masterpiece from mastermindChristopher Nolan. Since everything that is brilliant about the filmhas already been said I will briefly write what I think of the film andalso touch on a topic that some people are criticizing the movie for.

The fantastically directed film is told from 3 perspectives nonchronologically. It superbly tackles the narrative and the non linearstory doesn't at all pull you away from the intensity of the eventshappening on screen that don't stop from 00:00 to the last scene. HansZimmer most likely gives one of the most fitting scores for a war filmever. Sometimes there is only one note playing followed by heartbeatsounds and a ticking clock while other times a massive orchestra isinterpreting what is going on on screen. The movie brilliantly projectsthe feeling of each and every soldier on the beach to the audience.Confusion, turmoil and fear. The cinematography was breathtaking and Ifelt anxious throughout most of the run time. There is no lead in thisfilm and I can't really say anyone stuck out as giving a brilliantperformance because it wasn't needed and I'll explain why.

The biggest criticisms of Dunkirk that I've heard of so far are thatthe characters are lacking in depth and that we aren't given anythingto be invested in them. I feel like Nolan was trying (successfully) tomake the audience care for each and every one of the men on the beach.He needed to have some form of "main characters" to be in the story sothat we can see the events unfold from the direct perspective of all ofthe soldiers. Usually in war films (I'll use saving private Ryan as anexample) the plot revolves around certain soldiers (like Cpt. Millerand Ryan) being in a war and doing things in the war but its stillabout THEM not THE WAR as much. In my opinion Dunkirk is a telling theSTORY OF DUNKIRK. Not of Harry Style's character or Tom Hardy'scharacter but of Dunkirk. What any of the "main characters" felt, everyother soldier felt. Nolan resorted more to film-making techniques totell the story rather than dialogue and that is why some people mighthave had a problem with the lack of character depth but realisticallythis type of terrible event wouldn't be a place for someone to"develop" as a character but rather a event where MEN WANTED ONLYSURVIVAL, and Nolan showed that perfectly. As for what the top reviewof Dunkirk on IMDb says about 'lack of emotion' in the film, I believethis to be a completely incorrect statement. Maybe he was referring tothe lack of 'brotherhood amongst men' or the feeling of moral orsomething epic like that. Again the longing for the 'Saving PrivateRyan' format of war films. What the reviewer fails to see is thatrealistically there was NO emotion on that beach besides fear andconfusion. And I can safely say that Nolan and Zimmer and the DP allsuccessfully gave us those feelings.


Dunkirk (2017) 1080p Related Movies

In Like Flynn (2018) 1080p Poster

In Like Flynn (2018) 1080p

A Star Is Born (2018) 1080p Poster

A Star Is Born (2018) 1080p

Escape from the Bronx (1983) Poster

Escape from the Bronx (1983)

Soul Hunters (2019) 1080p Poster

Soul Hunters (2019) 1080p

Pals of the Saddle (1938) Poster

Pals of the Saddle (1938)

1990: The Bronx Warriors (1982) Poster

1990: The Bronx Warriors (1982)

Mr. Nice Guy (1997) 1080p Poster

Mr. Nice Guy (1997) 1080p

Black Panther (2018) 1080p Poster

Black Panther (2018) 1080p